Nick Fuentes has become increasingly influential in the past few years. While his job is literally causing controversy, not all controversy will benefit him, as seems to be the case here with Epstein:
Nick Fuentes claims Jeffrey Epstein’s international trafficking operation should not be labeled “pedophilia,” because it did not involve very young children.
He says the victims were “barely legal” teenagers.
The same statement has also been made by Alan Dershowitz. pic.twitter.com/CfBRyObIXC
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) January 14, 2026
If you don’t know who Alan Dershowitz is, by the way, he’s a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. He’s also a lawyer who enthusiastically specialises in defending rapists.
First Epstein, now Hitler
Despite being an hispanic virgin who loves Hitler, Fuentes has managed to make himself relevant on the US right by attracting an audience which is big enough to intimidate his peers:
The United States defeated the wrong enemy in World War II.
Nazism was in part a RESPONSE to the global communist revolution being fomented by Stalin.
And Hitler prevented the Soviet Union from invading all of Europe and inflicting rape, famine, and genocide.
— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) May 27, 2024
While there are claims his audience is heavily botted, the pressure he can put on other creators and commentators is real either way. This is why they treat him as a serious figure:
Fuentes and his followers are notable for opposing unconditional support for Israel. Fuentes isn’t the only one on the right with this opinion, with the rift becoming apparent at last year’s Turning Point USA conference, when a procession of speakers took turns bullying the Zionist Ben Shapiro:
“Is it America First to take money from a foreign lobby so you’ll send taxpayer dollars to that country?
The question kind of answers itself. Obviously it isn’t.”
— Tucker Carlson makes Ben Shapiro mad with an excellent point pic.twitter.com/LgB65yXuAL
— ADAM (@AdameMedia) December 19, 2025
While opposing unconditional support for Israel is good, it’s probably not hard to work out that the Hitler-loving Fuentes has different motives to pro-Palestinians. The fact that Fuentes holds these beliefs makes his defence of Epstein especially confusing, as the dead paedophile was a prominent supporter of the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). It’s also believed he was linked to US and Israeli intelligence.
Epstein’s IDF shirt is in the files.
It’s just a big mystery what country employed him. pic.twitter.com/ut9s9gwVlp— ĐⱤØ₲Ø
(@KAGdrogo) December 20, 2025
This is what Fuentes said about Epstein:
Nick Fuentes says “Epstein was cool as f*ck,” and that he has accepted his role as a villain and doesn’t care about being canceled.
“Go ahead, cancel me.”
“Jeffrey Epstein was cool as f*ck.” pic.twitter.com/7JniTPIFMx
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) January 17, 2026
The only way of reading this is that while Fuentes is ardently antisemitic, he will make an exception for any Jewish person who can commit industrialised sex crimes.
While Fuentes claims ‘Epstein wasn’t a paedophile’, that’s out of step with what we’ve been told. Specifically, the Department of Justice claim that Epstein possessed a substantial collection of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), referred to here as “child porn”:
Pam Bondi laughs at a reporter accusing the FBI of losing the Epstein files.
“There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.”
They can’t release files showing the victims, which is the reason for the delay.
Oh, and Pam now has the soccer ball.… pic.twitter.com/YWYX9o8XGE
— RealAF Patriot (@RealAF_Patriot) May 7, 2025
When Fuentes says ‘Epstein wasn’t a paedophile’, he’s referencing the following clinical definitions:
- Paedophilia (interest in pre-pubescent children).
- Hebephilia (interest in early-pubescent children).
- Ephebophilia (interest in mid- to late-teens).
Listen to this shit by Nick Fuentes:
“It’s not paedophillia, they weren’t trafficking 5 year olds, they were technically barely legal teens”
This is what’s called “he got the call”
Absolute
end.
— JonnyUtd (@Fx1Jonny) January 14, 2026
As stated, these are clinical definitions. For the purposes of normal, every day discourse, it’s standard to refer to anyone who molests children of any age as simply a ‘paedophile’. If anything, it’s preferable to do that, because it makes it clear to everyone that touching kids of any age is equally bad, and will result in exactly the same social and criminal consequences.
Let them fight
Some figures on the right have criticised Fuentes’ latest comments, but it’s worth bearing in mind that a lot of these people already hate each other:
Nick Fuentes is doubling down and saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile.
This creep has been trying to normalize this with his base for years.
This is the goal of satanism. Defile our children and offer them up as a sacrifice to the devil. pic.twitter.com/yYmMfu2sqp
— Morgan Ariel (@itsmorganariel) January 16, 2026
This isn’t the first time his rivals have accused him of being pro-paedophile, by the way:
A full breakdown of who Nick Fuentes is, who’s backing him and why.
This is very detailed with clips of him describing all of my claims. The dude openly promotes pedophelia and honey pots his listeners.
Over and over again.
I don’t think he’s a fed.
It’s way way worse. pic.twitter.com/0ILwrMiLbd— Owen Benjamin
(@OwenBenjamin) August 12, 2025
At this point, it’s unclear what sort of audience Fuentes wants to attract. One thing is obvious, though; it’s becoming clear why he may need to use bots.
Featured image via Archive
By Willem Moore
From Canary via This RSS Feed.
I have ZERO concern Whatsoever that the People who are Praising Jeffrey Epstein while doing EVERYTHING in their Power, Legally OR Illegally, to PROTECT Jeffrey Epstein are ALSO giving Armed Gunmen with NO BACKGROUND CHECKS Federal Immunity to KIDNAP CHILDREN and bring them To places that LAWMAKERS Can’t gain Access to!