As leading Democrats express hesitation about using an upcoming fight over government funding to cut off money for President Donald Trump’s illegal Iran war, Sen. Chris Van Hollen and Rep. Ro Khanna are pushing their party to act boldly against a conflict that spurred massive backlash against the GOP at the ballot box last week.

The Washington Sun reported Wednesday that Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Khanna’s (D-Calif.) call for Democrats to withhold their support for any government funding package unless it excludes money for the Iran war is “hitting resistance from senior members of the party.” The outlet cited several top Democrats, including Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, and other lawmakers who have voiced skepticism about potentially sparking a government shutdown over war funding just weeks after the midterms.

But Van Hollen, who is considering a run for Senate majority leader in the upcoming Congress, has countered that any blame for a shutdown would fall on Trump and his Republican Party.

“If the president wants to tell the country that he’s prepared to shut down the United States government in order to conduct an illegal and senseless war in Iran, that will be his choice,” said Van Hollen.

Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy and a former adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), echoed Van Hollen, writing to Democrats: “You wouldn’t be shutting down the government. You’d be offering a bill that funds the government but prohibits any funds for the war.”

“If Republicans oppose that,” Duss added, “they would be choosing to continue the war and shut down the government.”

Trump launched the war on Iran without congressional authorization in late February and has funded the conflict with existing Pentagon appropriations. The Pentagon has put the Iran war’s price tag at $47 billion—an estimate that outside experts say is a dramatic undercount.

The White House has called on Congress to approve a supplemental funding package that includes tens of billions of dollars for the war, which Trump administration officials previously said would be over in a matter of weeks.

Van Hollen told The Washington Sun last week that he is “not planning to vote for anything that provides any funding to fuel the war in Iran.”

“I think this is a really important moment for Democratic leadership,” said Van Hollen. “Are the Democrats, including the Democratic leadership, going to listen to the verdict of the American people and vote to end this war?”

Erik Sperling, executive director of the advocacy group Just Foreign Policy, said Wednesday that “if every Democrat was talking like Chris Van Hollen, we’d be just weeks away from ending this war.”

“Instead, too many AIPAC-backed Dems are acting powerless to stop one of the most unpopular wars and lame-duck presidents in history,” Sperling added.

Current government funding is set to expire on December 11.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who is vying to become House speaker in the upcoming Congress, would not commit to supporting efforts to cut off Iran war money in the upcoming government funding package and said the details are in the hands of Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democratic appropriators.

DeLauro said in a statement to Politico last week that “Democrats will absolutely not fund Trump’s war of choice with Iran that has increased costs on American families and made us less safe.” But The Washington Sun reported on Wednesday that neither DeLauro nor Murray “would commit to demanding Iran war restrictions as a condition of supporting a December funding extension, with Murray saying Democrats are examining their options.”

Sen. Patty Murray, ranking member on the Senate Appropriations Committee, tells me Democrats will “explore every option” to end the Iran war, but wouldn’t commit to opposing Schumer should he refuse to block any government funding bill with dollars for it. Murray has the power to stop war funding in the CR.
— Julian Andreone (@JulianAndreone) November 10, 2026

In a social media post earlier this week, Khanna—a possible 2028 presidential candidate—argued that the midterm results were “a cry for help by Americans who are in pain.” A tracker maintained by Brown University’s Watson School of International and Public Affairs estimates that the Iran war has cost US consumers over $157 billion in extra gasoline and diesel costs.

“Democrats must stop the war in Iran to bring down the cost of gas, food, and diesel,” Khanna wrote. “We can do this by insisting on no funding for Iran combat activities in the continuing resolution.”

This election was a cry for help by Americans who are in pain.This November, Democrats must stop the war in Iran to bring down the cost of gas, food, and diesel. We can do this by insisting on no funding for Iran combat activities in the continuing resolution. https://t.co/o7IrzGJlcY
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) November 9, 2026

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has joined Van Hollen and Khanna in demanding specific provisions in any government funding bill to ensure that no more money goes toward continuing the Iran war.

“I think we should come up with a funding bill that does things like replenishes munitions… all the stuff that we need to do as a nation, but say, ‘The war is illegal, until you get [congressional] authorization,‘" Kaine told Jewish Insider earlier this week. "I think we should put in a provision that says, ‘No funding for a war in Iran unless you get an authorization from Congress.’"

From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.