Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the lone Democrat on Thursday to help Republicans in the US Senate vote down a resolution to end the “illegal” war of choice launched against Iran by President Donald Trump earlier this year.

In the 49-50 vote, the Republican majority was able to block the latest resolution calling for an end to the war. While four Republicans—Susan Collins of Maine, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina—joined Democrats by voting in favor, Fetterman became the deciding vote.

Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) was among those expressing frustration with Fetterman, a lawmaker who has become a thorn in the side of his party since taking office and taking hard to the right with his pro-war positions, accommodations to Trump, and determined support for pro-Israeli policies.

“John Fetterman just cast the deciding vote to keep the Iran War raging,” said Deluzio. “This reckless war has cost American lives, innocent lives, tens of billions of dollars, and higher prices on nearly everything here at home. John and 49 Republican Senators voted in favor of all of that.”

“Fetterman never fails to disappoint,” said Susan Wild, a former Democratic member of the US House from Pennsylvania.

The vote came on the same day that an advocacy group representing American citizens with Iranian heritage sued the Trump administration for usurping the powers of Congress when it launched an “unconstitutional” war against Iran—a military conflict that has last nearly 7 months with no end in sight as causes misery across the Middle East and economic pain worldwide, including in the United States.

Filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Thursday, the lawsuit, filed on behalf of the National Iranian American Council Action (NIAC Action), asks the court to declare that President Donald Trump’s unprovoked attack on Iran violates the Constitution’s Declare War Clause.

In a statement, NIAC Action said the suit was brought “on behalf of its members whose families have been injured, displaced, economically devastated and are in continuing mortal danger as a result of a war that was never lawfully authorized.”

Launched on Feb. 28, the US attack, in coordination with the Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was launched despite ongoing diplomatic efforts and active talks over US sanctions against Iran and questions about Iran’s domestic nuclear program and its conventional missile capabilities. The war was initiated, according to the group,

without a declaration of war or other congressional authorization and that the war has continued, including repeated heavy bombardments and a naval blockade, despite this lack of authorization and the passage by both chambers of Congress of an explicit directive to terminate unauthorized hostilities against Iran.

“No President should have the power to take this country into an indefinite war by himself,” said NIAC Action president Jamal Abdi, in a statment. “Congress never authorized this war. Yet Iranian families are being bombed, American service members have been killed, and communities on both sides are being forced to bear the consequences. This lawsuit asks a fundamental question: can one person decide, on his own, to keep an entire nation at war?”

NIAC Action offered the example of one plaintiff, Nima Dilmaghani, whose cousin in Iran was injured when the company warehouse where she worked was bombed. Dilmaghani’s cousin, the group explained, “suffered a broken leg, serious damage to their eardrums and the loss of their index finger, which surgeons reattached but which has lost motion. Approximately ten of her coworkers were killed and approximately ten more were injured. In a separate bombing, their apartment was destroyed while they were away at work. They are now working two jobs to survive.” Other NIAC Action members have detailed similar stories.

Lawyers behind the lawsuit said that just because President Trump and other officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, have tried to argue that war against Iran is not a “war,” that does not make it so.

“President Trump has spent months waging a war that Congress never authorized, while insisting that changing the terminology somehow changes the constitutional question,” said attorney Bruce Fein. “Calling a war a ‘military operation’ or an ‘excursion’ does not erase the Declare War Clause. The question before the Court is whether the President can continue these hostilities without the authorization the Constitution requires.”

While War Powers resolutions have been passed in the House to cease military operations in Iran, none of those have been binding on President Trump and overall the Congress has stood aside in the face of what critics have described as criminal aggression and war crimes by Trump.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and other members of the Democratic Caucus in the US Senate, have continued to voice their opposition to Trump’s war as poll after poll show that the US voting public—across the political spectrum—want the war, and the economic harm it has wrought—to end.

“The American people, overwhelmingly, want to end this horrific war in Iran,” Sanders said after the failed vote. “Pathetically, today, nearly every Republican voted with Trump to keep the war going. When will Republicans represent their constituents and have the courage to oppose their mentally unstable leader?”

---

From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.