Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the most relentless proponents for using US military force overseas, died on Saturday night at the age of 71.

In a statement posted on Graham’s (R-SC) social media account, the senator’s office said that he “passed away from a brief and sudden illness.”

“Sen. Graham’s family appreciates prayers at this time,” the office added, “and asks for privacy during this incredibly difficult period.”

During his life, Graham advocated either starting or getting involved in multiple wars across the world, and he was reportedly instrumental in convincing President Donald Trump to launch an illegal attack on Iran without any authorization from the US Congress.

Although Graham was once a Trump critic—he infamously declared in 2016 that the Republican Party would get “destroyed” if it made the former Celebrity Apprentice host its presidential nominee—the South Carolina Republican grew to become one of the president’s staunchest allies.

Some critics of Graham reacted to his death by rehashing what they considered to be his least admirable traits.

David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, remarked that Graham “never met a war he didn’t want to send your kids to.”

Alejandra Caraballo, clinical instructor at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, also reflected on Graham’s lifetime of war mongering.

“You can say a lot about Lindsey Graham,” Caraballo wrote, “but at least he got to see the thing he most wanted before he died, bombing school children in Iran.”

Princeton historian Kevin Kruse predicted that Graham would leave behind a decidedly poor legacy.

“When Lindsey Graham appears in a history book,” wrote Kruse, “it’ll be his prediction in 2016 that the Republican Party would be destroyed for supporting Donald Trump and then a few lines about how he proved it by becoming Trump’s toady. That’s pretty much it. That’s his legacy. Pathetic lickspittle.”

Steve Schmidt, a former Republican strategist who left the party due to its embrace of Trump, wrote that Graham was “a simple, tragic man” who “lacked a moral core.”

“The great empty spaces of his life were filled with an insatiable need for ‘relevance,’” Schmidt observed. “He found it as a cast member in the most malignant reality show ever made.”

Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, had a similar analysis of Graham’s character.

“Lindsey Graham supported the International Criminal Court when it charged [Russian President Vladimir] Putin but turned on it when it charged [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu,” wrote Roth. “Principled, he wasn’t.”

Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, wrote that Graham “spent the last decade of his life in public service… trying hard to be remembered as an enemy of the Constitution who worked to destroy American democracy.”

Grossman added that Graham “exhibited occasional signs that he knew why that was bad but kept doing it anyway.”

Ruth Zakarin, CEO of the Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, offered a grim assessment of the late senator.

“Lindsey Graham will forever be remembered as an enabler of a regime that has murdered people, destroyed democratic norms, and caused irreparable harm to this county,” wrote Zakarin. “What a horrific legacy.”

---

From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.