Say you were being gradually-murdered by Huntington’s disease.

Say the medical “help” in your jurisdiction determined that forcing you to be murdered COMPLETELY by Huntington’s disease is what “good” means.

Does their institution-determination somehow MAKE that be “good”??

The same question-structure, remapped from Huntington’s to a serial-torture-murderer, say an inquisitor, would be:

say you come across someone torture-murdering someone, to the degree that it no-longer is possible for them to survive, & they’re begging for mercy-killing.

& you instead help them to live, against their will, as long as possible, while the inquisitor is torture-murdering them…

Is that “good”??

People who reject that ANY condition is gradually-murdering someone, are incompetent, & I hope they all get the direct, personal experience of understanding, themselves, so that their souls will grow TF up, sooner rather than later…

All souls/continuums experience all of their specific/own meanings, so it’s inevitable that the naive/incompetent are going to experience what they’re ignorant/niave about, … but they should get that learning done sooner, rather-than destroying others’-worth for as long as possible, before learning.

Hence my wish that their karma force them into experience-induced-understanding, instead of allowing them to remain wielding authority-on-others’-lives-in-total-ignorance-of-others’-actual-conditions.

The convenient symbol/belief/idea that they’re helping abuse/destroy/murder others with, isn’t worthy of such assumed-validity.

That has always been true.

< bitterness >

_ /\ _