On 30 January, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) released the latest tranche of Epstein Files. As we reported, the release contained allegations Trump is ‘compromised’ by Israel, and that he raped and beat a child. The files also contained new allegations against Andrew Windsor, including a tip off which accused him of being involved in torture and murder. Despite all this – and despite the fact Windsor was running around with a convicted sex offender for years – PM Keir Starmer has now refused to say the former prince should apologise.
Apologies
It’s important to understand that the Epstein Files contain claims which may have no merit when investigated. At the same time, you also need to realise that:
- We may never know which claims have merit and which don’t, because the authorities have failed to investigate the many crimes linked to Epstein.
- There is more than enough known about Windsor’s activities to say he’s a degenerate and a liar.
As we reported yesterday, Windsor claimed to have never met his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. Pictured below is an image of Windsor with Giuffre standing alongside Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell:
Prince Andrew reportedly used the met police to dig up dirt on a sex trafficking victim.
I told @DailyMail that his actions are utterly despicable, using his power and connections to smear Virginia Giuffre. I call for an investigation into his action.https://t.co/vAvb9glGrc
— Dr Charlotte Proudman (@DrProudman) October 19, 2025
The latest Epstein Files contain images of Windsor looming over what appears to be a child. The fact that the US Department of Justice (DoJ) redacted this person’s face indicates that they’re a victim:
It very clear the Royal Palace were given detailed briefings many months ago which led to the King culling the then Duke of York – now without title Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor . pic.twitter.com/qbMSXQFoCG
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) January 31, 2026
There’s also this:
The media are not covering the allegations that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor tortured a girl before instructing her murder. pic.twitter.com/ZZNIDZebma
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) January 31, 2026
The above tip could be true; it could be false.
What’s certifiably correct is that Windsor could have avoided all this by simply not hanging around with a notorious paedophile.
Starmer
Getting to Starmer, this is what he told the media (emphasis added):
I have always approached this question with the victims of Epstein in mind. Epstein’s victims have to be the first priority. As for whether there should be an apology that’s a matter for Andrew.
But yes in terms of testifying I have always said anybody who has got information should be prepared to share that information in whatever form they are asked to do that. You can’t be victim-centred if you’re not prepared to do that
Fuck you, Keir; you’re supposed to be the leader of this country – you absolutely cannot bow out from having an opinion.
The Windsors have rinsed the UK for hundreds of millions, and they used that money to defend Andrew Windsor against these vile accusations. We shouldn’t just be demanding an apology; we should be demanding these parasites return the wealth we afforded them.
Aren’t they supposed to represent us on the world stage?
I don’t know about you, but I don’t feel represented by this.
They’re all in it
Of course, Starmer isn’t best placed to tackle this issue, given that he elevated the Epstein’s ‘best pal’ Peter Mandelson, making him our ambassador to the US:
Well, well, well! #PeterMandelson lied to the world on #bbclaurak
“There were no young girls.”
Listen to him say it, then look at the photograph released as part of the #EpsteinFiles and #EpsteinTrumpCoverUp.
Why is he still in the House of Lords #Starmer? pic.twitter.com/l6cHbPfE3i
— Sinners of our time
(@Daily_Sinner) January 31, 2026
As people are furiously pointing out, Starmer is refusing to kick Mandelson out of the lords. Starmer is so bad on this issue, in fact, that I’m finding myself my agreeing with Simon Danczuk:
Mandelson was so close to Epstein that the paedophile sponsored the Peer’s husband through college, after he’d come out of prison for child abuse. And Starmer insists on keeping “Petie” in Labour and the Lords. They are a bunch of very sick people. pic.twitter.com/rAOsEGlB6H
— Simon Danczuk (@SimonDanczuk) January 31, 2026
At the same time, Danczuk is a creep who torched his career as a Labour MP by sexting a teen. I’m drawing attention to him because he’s linked to Reform now, and everyone should know Farage’s bunch are no better than Starmer’s when it comes to tolerating degeneracy.
Featured image via Epstein Files
By Willem Moore
From Canary via This RSS Feed.
