In response to a published court transcript, one journalist has suggested that the case against the recently kidnapped president Maduro of Venezuela might already be lost:
What you may have missed in this is the subtle claim that Maduro was not read his Miranda rights.
It’s clear his lawyer will be absolutely contesting both the jurisdiction and process.
And because of Trump’s buffoonery, we may end up having to just return Maduro to Venezuela. https://t.co/HVCbhSkna3
— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) January 6, 2026
What are Miranda rights – and how could they affect Maduro?
Miranda rights are a vital feature of the US legal system, having been afforded in 1966 after the case of Miranda v Arizona. The case established a long-cherished legal safeguard for American citizens, stipulating that legal rights must be communicated to individuals in police custody before interrogation.
If there is any reasonable doubt that those rights were not communicated to and understood by the individual in custody (Maduro), any subsequent information or evidence gathered can no longer be used as evidence in a criminal trial.
The court transcript read:
Judge: Are you Nicolas Maduro Moros?
Maduro: I am the President of Venezuela. I consider myself a prisoner of war. I was captured at my home in Caracas.
Judge: Let me intervene. There will be time for this.
Judge: I only want to know—are you Nicolas Maduro Moros?
Maduro: Yes.
Judge: Have you been served the indictment?
Defense lawyer: We waive the public reading.
Maduro: I have it in my hands for the first time. I prefer to read it personally.
Judge: Anything you say may be used against you. I see you have counsel here, Mr. Pollack. If you cannot afford one, the government will provide a lawyer free of charge. Did you know of these rights?
Maduro: I did not know of these rights until now.
Judge: How do you plead?
Maduro: I am innocent. I am a decent man. I am President of Venezuela.
Defense lawyer: The plea is not guilty on all counts.
Legal rights are essential in ensuring that hard-won civil rights are afforded in situations where the state often has unparallelled power over the citizen. Many a criminal case have been seen to collapse on a technicality, whether there was merit or not to any criminal allegations. For instance, Alec Baldwin saw the case against him collapse due to an infringement of his Brady Rights under US law.
Alec Baldwin charged with manslaughter for shooting on “Rust” film set.
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/ktYbCIOFuR
— AF Post (@AFpost) January 19, 2024
A judge in New Mexico dismissed the case against Alec Baldwin on Friday after finding that the state had withheld evidence that could have shed light on how live rounds got onto a film set where the cinematographer was fatally shot. https://t.co/odmrwvxxp8 pic.twitter.com/LQKbkQktfR
— The New York Times (@nytimes) July 12, 2024
However, this is new territory with such a flagrant breach of international law, so time will tell whether this will be the ‘straw that breaks the camel’s back’ in the US case against Maduro.
This X account suggests the oil billionaires might even end up missing out on the spoils of Trump’s extraterritorial posturing:
Just one reason the big oil companies are hesitant about a return to Venezuela. They don’t know if Maduro is going to be convicted & if he’s not, he returns to Venezuela & again, the big oil companies are out. Hence, Trump puts taxpayers on the hook as a guarantee.
— Sandi Anthony (@SandiAnthony1) January 6, 2026
As always, the people who are left with the fallout from corrupt politicians are hard-working taxpayers, whilst the powerful get off scot-free.
This is my issue with Trump. It’s not even the outright tyranny of it all, it’s that he can’t even be bothered to be a tyrant correctly https://t.co/SRCeBY3k6n
— Joe Roche (@JRoche3MR) January 6, 2026
Quite embarrassing really
Trump has made no secret of his distaste for ‘lefty lawyers’ and ‘wokeism’. So, when we see him then use the legal system in order to achieve the desires of his billionaire buddies in the oil industry, it feels all the more disingenuous.
The irony is he can’t even do this right, with Maduro potentially able to escape Trumps ‘justice’ simply because US agents didn’t read the (short) legally mandated statement of rights.
Featured image via Palacio d Plannalto
From Canary via This RSS Feed.
Does this even matter? It’s not a legitimate trial.
Is the technicality that he’s not subject to US law? Because that’s probably what you should be reporting.
came to say this.
If Maduro has any chance of getting out with a not guilty verdict, there wouldn’t even be a trial to begin with. None of this has anything to do with the law.
Even assuming they give him a real trial, I don’t think this is going to change anything. All this means is that if they’ve interrogated before now him they can’t admit anything he said as evidence
One can only wish… but yeah.
of course
