

Lmfao how childish.


Lmfao how childish.


Stupidity, willful ignorance and splitting hairs is far more harmful.
You’re the type that would be more upset people are calling someone a slave owner instead of a slave driver than the fact there are slaves at all. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater


Lmfao it literally doesn’t and is not harmful at all. What possibly could be harmful about calling the executive chairman a CEO?
It’s like mistaking the executive chef as the head chef or chef de cuisine.
From the outside nobody would know what the hell the difference is and to be honest it would be largely irrelevant.


Yes it is. CEO is more day to day, he just doesn’t have to do that anymore. He’s the Executive Chairman and I believe the largest shareholder as well. He’s still completely active in the company.
Nobody in the world is going to misinterpret the difference between an executive chairman and a CEO. Neither you or I even know the specifics of what either role’s specific duties are. It’s literally irrelevant


He’s literally above the CEO he pays someone to do work he doesn’t need to do anymore. But that doesn’t mean he’s not involved. He’s still the guy in charge


A journalists job is to translate information for the masses. I don’t think referring to him as CEO is that damaging to the story


I mean yeah reporter could’ve used the right term but Bezos still runs Amazon. He’s not separated from the company. Not sure why you have such an issue with the person using the term CEO vs chairman which in my opinion would be more confusing for the wider audience
We’re at war with Iran so nobody thinks about Trump being a pedophile