Progressive anger and calls for primary challenges followed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ Monday endorsement of top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer—under whose leadership numerous Democratic lawmakers caved to Republicans to pave the way to ending the government shutdown without winning any meaningful concessions.

As progressives demanded the resignation or ouster of Schumer (D-NY), Jeffries (D-NY) was asked during a press conference whether the 74-year-old senator is effective and whether he should remain as the upper chamber’s minority leader.

“Yes and yes,” replied Jeffries. “As I’ve indicated, listen, Leader Schumer and Senate Democrats over the last seven weeks have waged a valiant fight on behalf of the American people.”

“I don’t think that the House Democratic Caucus is prepared to support a promise, a wing and a prayer, from folks who have been devastating the healthcare of the American people for years,” he said.

Asked if he thinks Schumer is effective and should keep his job, Hakeem Jeffries replies: “Yes and yes.”

[image or embed]
— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein.bsky.social) November 10, 2025 at 2:07 PM

Both Schumer and Jeffries say they will vote “no” on the the GOP bill to end the shutdown.

Activist and former Democratic National Committee Co-Vice Chair David Hogg said on social media that Schumer’s “number one job is to control his caucus,” and “he can’t do that.”

Eight members of the Senate Democratic caucus—Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Dick Durbin (Ill.), John Fetterman (Pa.), Maggie Hassan (NH), Tim Kaine (Va.), Angus King (I-Maine), Jacky Rosen (Nev.), and Jeanne Shaheen (NH)—enabled their Republican colleagues to secure the 60 votes needed for a cloture vote to advance legislation to end the shutdown.

Critics say the proposal does nothing to spare Americans from soaring healthcare premiums unleashed in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by President Donald Trump in July.

“Standing up to a tyrant—who is willing to impose pain as leverage to compel loyalty or acquiescence—is hard,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said Monday. “You can convince yourself that yielding stops the pain and brings you back to ‘normal.’ But there is no ‘normal.’ Submission emboldens the tyrant. The threat grows.”

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said on X: “Sen. Schumer is no longer effective and should be replaced. If you can’t lead the fight to stop healthcare premiums from skyrocketing for Americans, what will you fight for?”

New York City Councilman Chi Ossé (D-36)—who on Sunday said that Schumer and Senate Democrats “failed Americans” by capitulating to “MAGA fascists”—laughed off Jeffries’ ringing endorsement of Schumer’s leadership.

Former Democratic Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner called Jeffries and Schumer “controlled opposition” while demanding that they both “step down.”

The progressive political action group Our Revolution published a survey last week showing overwhelming grassroots support for running primary challenges to Schumer and Jeffries. The poll revealed that 90% of respondents want Schumer to step down as leader, while 92% would support a primary challenge against him when he’s next up for reelection in 2028. Meanwhile, 70% of respondents said Jeffries should step aside, with 77% backing a primary challenge.

Turner also called for a ban on corporate money in politics and ousting “corporate politicians.”

Left Reckoning podcast host Matt Lech said on X that “when guys like Jeffries and Schumer say ‘effective’ they’re talking about effectively flattering large-dollar donors.”

---

From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.