What makes that “quite clear?” I’m genuinely asking. Declaring martial law is the next step in the project 2025 playbook. The fact that they haven’t done it yet suggests they’re waiting for riots. Releasing the cell phone video from that shitbag Nazi Robinson suggests they’re fanning the flames, trying to get ICE agents killed. What do you know which suggests they could declare martial law at any time?
Correct. This is a news community. I’m not about to oppose articles of a political nature in a community where it actually belongs. I only go about “whining” about political posts in communities that either specifically have rules against political posts or ones that should have those rules.
Yes, this article is very obviously rage bait, and sharing it is exactly what they want you to do. It’s painfully obvious. The same article is being run by the New York Post, for fucks sake. They know that this will piss you off, and then in your angry state you’ll share it with other people who will also be pissed off. Of fucking course they’re going to harass the victims family. They always do. And they do it because they want to make you angry and reckless. They do it because they know how you’ll react. How does it feel to be effortlessly manipulated by Nazis?
Unless you’re going to actually do something tangible about this, and somehow protect that kid, then you’re just fanning the flames by sharing the vile shit they’re going to keep doing whether or not we know the specifics of it.
…do you think taking a word I deliberately chose for my username and using it to put me down makes you clever? If you think sharing rage bait does anything other than help the Nazis, then yes, I imagine you’re also dumb enough to think that “username checks out” would be a clever thing to say.
They want violence so martial law can be declared. Sharing this article actually promotes their agenda.
Correct.